精华 苦辣酸甜难书尽,成败得失笑谈中

INTC beats; JPM reports before the bell tomorrow

Sold my RMBS puts today, which substantially offset my calls losses. I don't want to leave them on the last day. Also sold my BAC FEB. calls.

I am bearish about this bank ER season but I need JMP ER for a confirmation. Will re-establish my RMBS and BAC positions soon. Will probably initiate a WFC position too.
 
Interesting to know you start to look at WFC now. JPM probably is the first bank back to normal, while BAC might be the last. I don't follow C anymore. When the normalization occurs is anyone's guess.

The first step will be suspension of addition to reserves. This will allow around $2B pre-tax to flow to earnings.

WFC may take a few quarters to reach this goal but it may surprise. Same thing for BAC.

From valuation point of view, I think near term values of JPM, WFC and BAC are $55, $35 and $20 ....

Congratulations on your neutral result on RMBS. The event was not strong enough I guess.

INTC is doing pretty well. It is hard not to do well with 80% market share.....
 
By the way, I am impressed by the amount of gun powder you have. I think doing covered calls or selling puts shall serve you really well since you are willing to risk large capital.

The monthly premium will be small but quite significant if annualized. Taking WFC as an example. Its Feb $29 call is more than 3% at current level. As long as it doesn't drop below $25, you can keep writing every month. As you have a secure monthly cash flow, anything out of range, say low 20's can be bought with future flows.

I think this line operation shall be profitable in the market environment in the next few years ...
 
JPM disappoints

It appears my call for a disappointing JPM ER yesterday is correct. While INTC good ER failed to lift the market in AH trading, this should drag the market downwards significantly and trigger the long-expected correction. As planned, I will put cash to work and build puts positions in BAC and WFC and possibly add LVS and MGM puts today. It is time to go short/puts.
 
By the way, I am impressed by the amount of gun powder you have. I think doing covered calls or selling puts shall serve you really well since you are willing to risk large capital.

The monthly premium will be small but quite significant if annualized. Taking WFC as an example. Its Feb $29 call is more than 3% at current level. As long as it doesn't drop below $25, you can keep writing every month. As you have a secure monthly cash flow, anything out of range, say low 20's can be bought with future flows.

I think this line operation shall be profitable in the market environment in the next few years ...

Generally speaking, your idea of writing covered calls and so on is brilliant. I heard most professionals play the market that way. But I am no professional. Playing the market is only my moonlighting. The kind of operations you described doesn't work for me. In addition to my die-hard long positions (I also swing a portion of those periodically), I play straight options for special events (e.g., bio trial results annoucements, FDA rulings on big drugs, court trials, ER), risking to lose all and aiming to gain 2-20X. Both kinds of end results indeed happened before and will surely happen ahead.

After last year's remarkable recovery from the lows, the market will correct downwards forcefully in the first half of this year, IMO. As such, I am sitting on about 75% cash, looking to build up puts positions (I don't short any stock for the exposure is too large to handle in case of wrong calls whereas the worst can happen with puts is I end up losing all). I made the right call last Thursday about JPM ER and closed my banks' calls positions. But my conviction was not strong enough to build up puts positions immediately. I needed confirmation (by JPM ER). At yesterday's open, I have already missed a 25-40% run in the puts I targetted to build. I only managed to open 1/3 puts in BAC and WFC, looking to add for their ER's next week. LVS and MGM were not volative enough to add. It is my first time playing with AMAG and I am always tame in the first hand of tradings.

Going forward, I would rather be late than wrong. Being wrong many times in the past before confirmation (i.e., making commitments too early) and lost a fortune each time. The most recent example is RMBS. My small calls position caught the news of EU dropping the antitrust case (being lucky as that was not in my DD expectation) and I closed that gaining 450% in 3 days last December. I went back the next day, building up a much bigger (fairly-sized) calls option for the price-fixing case vs Samsung, Micron and Hynix court opening. Right after I completed my calls position with 5 buys, the pps took a heavy beating. Realizing that I have made my commitment in one direction too early, I bought some puts. The court opening was indeed delayed for two days. But my puts started to go down violently too as the pps flatlined. I was harshly squeezed at both ends. Being fully commited, I could not do anything other than to see my brokerage account value going down a few thousand dollars every day. Finally, the anticipated big move down came last Wednesday. Seeing that, I closed my calls, saving whatever left. The puts started to move up huge but I did not have the conviction to leave a rather big amount of cash on the table to the last day of OE. I closed my puts last Thursday. I made many wrong moves in just one operation. Fortunately, the puts saved my working capital and I came out of that operation with a tiny loss. The court cases will take a long time to get resolved. This is labelled as a Top-10 tech court case of the decade and I will go back into it with both calls and puts. As the pps drifts lower, upside potentials are getting increasingly bigger and downside risks increasingly smaller, I will become increasingly biased towards calls. My position will reverse when the pps reverse.

I lost huge in SVA and am looking for a chance to get back in on the long/calls side for the 4QER.

Up to this point, I have mostly been on the long side of the fence. The Xmas period gave me solace to soul-search and reflect. From this point on, I am determined to play both sides of the fence. My time, energy and ability to search and research are all highly limited. I would greatly appreciate if you and anyone else could offer leads to stocks that are expecpted to move, eithe way. I don't want to look at stocks that remain flatlined for months/years. I want volatility. Only leads are needed. I will do my own DD.

Thanks in advance and with all the very best of wishes!
 
A big week ahead

In addition to 4QER's for bellwethers like GS, BAC, IBM and GOOG, market moving economic news include reports on housing starts, producer prices, leading indicators, and weekly jobless. I have lightened up my long commitments after the good run in the first week of the new year while building up some puts positions. Plan to buy back DNDN calls but mostly initiate/add to puts positions comes Tuesday (Markets are closed for MLK Day).

Short-term expectations (Feb. puts exit points): BAC 15 and WFC 25 (both are TARP repayment-related offer pps). In addition to expected bad ER's (JPM's consumer loan losses led me to this line of thinking), the contraversies over Obama's proposed bank tax are expected to exert downward pressures on the banking sector. LVS 16, MGM 10, and AMAG 45. They shall all over-shoot in case of sudden market sentiment changes triggered by unexpected news (geopolitical, political, natural, economic).

Should a double-dip recession materializes, last March's lows may be revisited and it will take a lot longer to recover again.

My puts targets are the few big runners I missed last year: GNW, UAUA and MS. I hope not to make commitments too early again but reserve cash for such developments.
 
There is a saying that if you can't lick them, join them. Buffett said if you can join them, lick them.

I will learn from you on how floating with market works.

One area I noticed for sometime is this. If a stock hits 52-week high at the end of a year, it tends to have lower level than this high within the next year. Normally, the low is more than 10% than the high. For cyclical sectors, like retail, semi etc, the volatility is more dramatic.

On the other hand, the 1-year put premium is generally at around 10%. So, if you do DD in those sectors and could risk your capital on such puts, I speculate the return over years must be good.

I think it is easy to find out those year-end highs and then just select weak cyclical stocks that are making highs. Especially those with weak balance sheet and weak earning powers ...
 
There is a saying that if you can't lick them, join them. Buffett said if you can join them, lick them.

I will learn from you on how floating with market works.

One area I noticed for sometime is this. If a stock hits 52-week high at the end of a year, it tends to have lower level than this high within the next year. Normally, the low is more than 10% than the high. For cyclical sectors, like retail, semi etc, the volatility is more dramatic.

On the other hand, the 1-year put premium is generally at around 10%. So, if you do DD in those sectors and could risk your capital on such puts, I speculate the return over years must be good.

I think it is easy to find out those year-end highs and then just select weak cyclical stocks that are making highs. Especially those with weak balance sheet and weak earning powers ...

Cat: don't forget also the saying that the trend is a participant's friend. As such, I no longer put rising issues nor call declining stocks, especially making new highs/lows. Stocks rise or drops for a reason, may or may not be known to players.

Staying with the trend is easy. The hardest work lies in spotting the trigger that changes the trend and accordingly making moves ahead of the herd. If one is mindful enough, one will hear and see the trigger the market sends. Stocks have characters and talk to players if one is careful enough to listen and see. To give you a specific example, BAC was making higher highs above 18 daily and broke 19. Exactly during that time period, the judge did not approve the SEC-BAC settlement over the Merrill bonuses issue. The issue in itself was not that significant and I talked about it with a few friends who also longed BAC. But this triggered the uncertainty and the political cloud which the market just loves to hate. The market was behaving abnormally for a few days upon that news and I clearly saw it. But because of my own pig-headed stupidity amid many huge winning hands, I failed to act according to what I see. Another huge loss example was SVA. I over-estimated the likely impacts H1N1 may cause based on historical pandemics, ignoring the Chinese political environment and forming my 3Q EPS and hence pps targets based on orders/shipments rather than actual payments. The failed attempt to stay above 10 upon the ER was clearly a cue that the market did not like the report and should be enough for me to close my position for a huge profit. Instead of selling them, I piled on calls on the way down and ended up with a devastating loss.

It is forever a learning process, my friend. Sometimes, it may only take a seemingly trivial news to trigger a change in trends. To pat on my own back, I saved a fairly-sized chunk of working capital out of the paper profits to fight again in the days/months/years ahead. I shall remain a contrarian but strive to listen and act to the market-sent cues. Speculation/expectation aside, I am just starting to learn how to prepare for the unexpectable (my RMBS puts were the starting point).
 
There is a saying that if you can't lick them, join them. Buffett said if you can join them, lick them.

I will learn from you on how floating with market works.

One area I noticed for sometime is this. If a stock hits 52-week high at the end of a year, it tends to have lower level than this high within the next year. Normally, the low is more than 10% than the high. For cyclical sectors, like retail, semi etc, the volatility is more dramatic.

On the other hand, the 1-year put premium is generally at around 10%. So, if you do DD in those sectors and could risk your capital on such puts, I speculate the return over years must be good.

I think it is easy to find out those year-end highs and then just select weak cyclical stocks that are making highs. Especially those with weak balance sheet and weak earning powers ...

Cat: after going through my trading records during the Xmas season and re-examining the stocks I have played with last year, it was effortless for me to come to the conclusion that I need to float with the market rather than playing the long side all the time. I just started practising this newly-established strategy in the new year and BAC is the first guinea pig. This is the way I shall play the market going forward but it will surely take quite some time for it to mature. After losing all those hard-earned profits in the last three months of last year, thinking is easy but actions take capital and much harder to take. I am gradually adopting this strategy with small amount of cash involved (no more than 5% of working capital with each commitment) and will increase my commitments once I feel more confident about it. DNDN and BAC calls kicked off my year on a very encouraging note. I need to win with my existing BAC, WFC, AMAG, LVS and MGM puts to reaffirm my comfort with it. Trying new things will surely cost money and I am fully prepared to pay tuition fees, AGAIN. The safest bet is not to get involved in the market at all. So, anyone of a risk-averse nature please don't participate in the market.

Let me repeat my objective in starting this thread: record my tradings and reasons behind my operations, hopefully leading to a book in the end. I wish anybody and everybody to profit from the market following my leads but it is your money and I won't pay for your potential losses!

Best of lucks!
 
JPM - Q4 Results

Jamie Dimon, JPM's CEO, is the most capable leader in US big banks. The decisions made by JPM and their executions are exemplary for all other banks.

JPM's result in Q4 is still very strong, with some nuances. The most significant point is continuation of credit reserve buildup, currently at $32 B or 5.5% of entire loan portfolio. At same time, JPM will trim its consumer loans and thus keep reducing the size of its balance sheet.

This is a huge positive point that indicates the strong character of Jamie Dimon's management team ! Here is why:

1. Using extremely conservative approach to build up reserve substantially strengthen a bank's balance sheet. It is clear big banks can only rely on themselves in current hostile policy and economic environment. Letting profit flow to dividend or announced earnings is extremely stupid and put shareholders at great danger.

2. Jamie points out Basel III requirement on capital is not clear and he is preparing for potentially higher capital requirement. Plus, although he thinks later half of 2010 shall see improvement in credit situation, he doesn't want to bet on it.

JPM spends over $7 B on reserve build ($1.9 B) and loan charge-offs. Imagine this amount flow to quarterly profit !!!

It is my take that any big banks (WFC, BAC or C) should be dumped if they are foolish enough not to keep building reserves but rather declare dividend or higher profit.

The big banks, especially JPM and WFC, have substantial earning power once economy starts to normalize. They should keep these goodies out of the government and reserve them for big paybacks to long-term shareholders.
 
Bank of Hawaii

I found this bank in one of my study and thought it was superbly run. I also wrote another bank, CPF, was really poor. Coincidentally, BOH was named by Forbes as a top regional bank in US. CPF was named the second worst.

It is not hard to spot shining beauty I guess.

While JPM and WFC shall keep goodies away, BOH shall declare share buybacks ! This regional bank has around $12 B asset with only $100 M debt ! Plus, it has been paying down debt. I have never seen another bank that is being run like this.

If BOH starts to buy back shares more forcefully, I believe shareholders shall be paid quite handsomely in the years to come. It will also report next week I believe.
 
I found this bank in one of my study and thought it was superbly run. I also wrote another bank, CPF, was really poor. Coincidentally, BOH was named by Forbes as a top regional bank in US. CPF was named the second worst.

It is not hard to spot shining beauty I guess.

While JPM and WFC shall keep goodies away, BOH shall declare share buybacks ! This regional bank has around $12 B asset with only $100 M debt ! Plus, it has been paying down debt. I have never seen another bank that is being run like this.

If BOH starts to buy back shares more forcefully, I believe shareholders shall be paid quite handsomely in the years to come. It will also report next week I believe.

Generally, I am not interested in regional banks but will take a look at BOH and CPF this time around. I will let you know if I make any move.
 
Jamie Dimon, JPM's CEO, is the most capable leader in US big banks. The decisions made by JPM and their executions are exemplary for all other banks.

JPM's result in Q4 is still very strong, with some nuances. The most significant point is continuation of credit reserve buildup, currently at $32 B or 5.5% of entire loan portfolio. At same time, JPM will trim its consumer loans and thus keep reducing the size of its balance sheet.

This is a huge positive point that indicates the strong character of Jamie Dimon's management team ! Here is why:

1. Using extremely conservative approach to build up reserve substantially strengthen a bank's balance sheet. It is clear big banks can only rely on themselves in current hostile policy and economic environment. Letting profit flow to dividend or announced earnings is extremely stupid and put shareholders at great danger.

2. Jamie points out Basel III requirement on capital is not clear and he is preparing for potentially higher capital requirement. Plus, although he thinks later half of 2010 shall see improvement in credit situation, he doesn't want to bet on it.

JPM spends over $7 B on reserve build ($1.9 B) and loan charge-offs. Imagine this amount flow to quarterly profit !!!

It is my take that any big banks (WFC, BAC or C) should be dumped if they are foolish enough not to keep building reserves but rather declare dividend or higher profit.

The big banks, especially JPM and WFC, have substantial earning power once economy starts to normalize. They should keep these goodies out of the government and reserve them for big paybacks to long-term shareholders.

Markets are never wrong, only players are. Friday's reactions to JPM ER told me that JPM results were not liked on two fronts: 1) The bottom line was fine but top line disappointed and with declining top line, rising bottom line has to come from increasing margins, which is simply unsustainable; and 2) consumer loan losses keep rising. The turnaround will surely happen for banks but I won't bet my dollars before the URate dips below 9%, which I see won't be happening until Q4 this year if all goes without any surprises. We may experience a double-dip recession or a jobless recovery, in either case banks won't be able to flow reserves into earnings because they can't stop loaning.

I took a very quick look at BOH and CPF and I will pass. They are too stable for me to take any action.
 
No chance of volatility play for BOH or CPF. BOH is good for long-term holding but expectation for appreciation must be moderate. CPF is probably on the rope already.

DECK is an interesting company I studied for historical reasons. This is an example of good company in cyclical industry. It is hitting 52-week high and if you believe in double dip, this could be a candidate.

I think its sale is seasonal. You can find out from 10-K ...
 
If Democrats lose MS senate election, the health care bill be dead. Any chance of playing on HUM, UNH etc ? Feb call of course.

Also, brkb will be split 50 to 1 on Wed. This will yield to volatility, quite extreme in quarters 3 and 4 downwide and q1/q2 upward etc ...
 
后退
顶部