精华 苦辣酸甜难书尽,成败得失笑谈中

ITMN

What is fair value of ITMN if the drug is approved by FDA ? The potential sale of the drug is $1 B.

I think ITMN is now in same position as DNDN a few years ago. If FDA delays approval, I guess ITMN will come down to $10 ?
 
What is fair value of ITMN if the drug is approved by FDA ? The potential sale of the drug is $1 B.

I think ITMN is now in same position as DNDN a few years ago. If FDA delays approval, I guess ITMN will come down to $10 ?

The FDA AC voting result are 9-3 in favour of approval. The FDA usually follows AC's recommendations but is not required to do so. The May 2007 non-approval on DNDN's Provenge was unprecedented for a revolutionary biologics to treat a terminal disease that victimizes millions of men around the globe. Investigations by Deep Capture have proven beyond the reasonable doubt that it was a corrupted decision by the FDA bought by the network of short sellers and big pharmas. That corrupted ruling brought unspeakable misery to millions of men and their families and financially destroyed my dreams. I am no longer bitter. Life goes on. But legal battles may emerge after this May's FDA decision. Will history repeat itself for ITMN? That remains to be seen and I sincerely hope not, for the sake of the patients and stock longs, although I have no position.

This is a hugely successful bio story of the year. Seeing the spetacular blowups of XNPT and MDVN, I was reluctant to get involved and missed a huge run. A strangle play would have been the most appropriate given the conflicting two trial results. Now that two of the three FDA-related plays are gone (Review doc, AC), the only potential play that is left is the final decision. I expect trading to be volatile up to the PDUFD. Upon approval, it will become a normal drug company, the pps being determined by sales.

Let me take your 1B sale figure and run a rough valuation. Total shares outstanding are 46M. In fast growing bio, the PS ratio (price to sales) can range between 3 to 20. Assuming a PS ratio of 5 (conservatively), ITMN potential pps is around 100 at peak sale assuming the FDA follows the AC recommendation.

There will be a few factors to look for a possible entry: 1) The FDA final decision --- the most pps influencing; 2) new shares offer to raise capital; 3) timing of product launch; 4) sales after launch; 5) partnership possibility; 6) European acceptance of application. These are the fundamentals. As for technicals, how shorts go for their money and life (a few hedge funds are surely going BK by this) decides short-term volatility. You and I are not privy to this info. I will take this stock on as a big project the next little while and will share with you my DD via email.

Assuming approval, no manufacturing hiccups and given the low number of shares outstanding, ITMN potentials may be as good as DNDN. I will also need to look for the pipeline.

Now, if the FDA decides to delay approval, you can be assured that it will go back under 15.

The PDUFA date is May 4. I expect volatile trading up to this date, followed by a huge sell the news fall upon approval (tanking if approval is delayed). I plan to build a small puts position for the final FDA decision and then go long. I am not technically inclined at all and don't have a handle on the TA side of trading (TA doesn't apply before earnings anyway). The only short-term potential play I plan to make is a small puts position, as soon as tomorrow at open. Just check and May options are not out yet. If I do play, I will trade April options with a small stake until May options becoming available following this month's expiration. They may open May options today or tomorrow, though, keep an eye on it if you are interested.

My two casinos are treating me very well the last few days. I closed my deep-in-the-money March calls positions yesterday but hesitated a bit to open April positions on the pullback in the afternoon. It is likely I will have to chase. I still have in-the-money calls positions to close. Plan to roll some into April.
 
ITNM etc

Thanks for sharing your thoughts on ITNM. This is definitely more interesting than DNDN coming May. I think DNDN is pretty much certain to get its approval.

Do you think there is upward surprises for DNDN ? The chance of approval should be very high already.

My gut feeling is that ITNM may get conditional approval if there is such thing. Your comments are appreciated. Is it just approval or delay of approval ? Or there is conditional approval ?

The efficacy of ITNM is not obvious. Plus, ITNM is not able to explain the differences in two trials. So, approval conditional on further study should be reasonable, I guess.

May option is not out yet and maybe there is angle for play. I guess the May play will be very different from March play ... We'll see.

Is it LVS and MGM the two casinos you were talking about ? I lost track after looking into it a few months ago ...
 
Thanks for sharing your thoughts on ITNM. This is definitely more interesting than DNDN coming May. I think DNDN is pretty much certain to get its approval.

Do you think there is upward surprises for DNDN ? The chance of approval should be very high already.

My gut feeling is that ITNM may get conditional approval if there is such thing. Your comments are appreciated. Is it just approval or delay of approval ? Or there is conditional approval ?

The efficacy of ITNM is not obvious. Plus, ITNM is not able to explain the differences in two trials. So, approval conditional on further study should be reasonable, I guess.

May option is not out yet and maybe there is angle for play. I guess the May play will be very different from March play ... We'll see.

Is it LVS and MGM the two casinos you were talking about ? I lost track after looking into it a few months ago ...

There are four types of FDA decisions: rejection, approval, complete response (delayed approval conditional on further data, may be related to study or CMC --- chemistry, manufacturing and control), conditional approval of use for humanitarian considerations (for terminal diseases with no effective treatment but further data are required for full approval). There is also one more possibility of delayed decisions, related to shortage of staff or natural conditions, e.g., many AC meetings were delayed this past January due to snow in Washington/New York.

DNDN's 9902B (IMPACT) data were out in the public for nearly a year. I would say the chance of gaining approval is very high but when it comes to the FDA, I will believe it when I see the approval letter. It is this regulatory risk that still keeps a lid on DNDN pps. I expect a surge upon approval followed by a fall due to profit taking. I bought back all my May calls yesterday after closing my March LVS and MGM calls. I plan to trade a portion of DNDN while leaving my core holding lock up.

As for ITMN, a lot can still happen until the PDUFA date. I got a little April puts yesterday expecting a fall thanks to profit taking. But bulls were in full charge. I think ITMN tops out at 40 for now and retracement may take a few days. The risk for playing such a rocket ship is extremely high --- options premia are very expense. So I just got a small stake to get the feel. I fully intend to play strangle when May options are out.

Yes, I hold both LVS and MGM, rolling some March calls into Appril and May positions.

There are a couple of FDA decisions for tomorrow but I will simply let go.

AIG has run up like a strong bull again lately. But the fundamentals are getting increasingly worse by selling money makers to pay back Treasury. I am keeping an eye wide open for a put when I see any sign of weakness. I think this crzay runup is caused by short covering.
 
Thanks for the information on FDA process. ITMN will be interesting in May for sure.

It seems the market might be trying to re-value stocks, particularly financials. Without earning support, however, the upward valuation might be limited. Q1 shall be interesting ...
 
Positions update

Calls positions:

DNDN --- I have repeatedly posted about it, no further word is needed

LVS --- rolled March calls into April ones after taking huge profits

MGM --- rolled March calls into April ones after taking small profits, also closed April deep-in-the-money calls today

BAC --- recently opened at the high, in water

MDVN --- opened after the spectacular drop, added after stabilization around 12 for a recovery play

Strangle:

AMLN --- just opened today for the FDA decision on one of its key drugs, my play will be profitable as long as big movements take place, no matter which way. The FDA's decision is expected today. No news yet, expect to see PR Monday

Puts positions:

ITMN --- opened after the phenomenal rise following the FDA's AC, expecting a forceful retracement. Plan to enter a strangle play once May options are out

AIG --- opened today, expecting a big drop. I did not put it at 38 yesterday because there was no sign of weakness there. Today, it showed weakness after a spectalur run following the news of selling a profitable division to pay back the Treasury. I read that news as very negative on its fundamentals

These are my own plays and I don't advise anybody to follow. It is your hard-earned money. It is you, only you, that can take good care of it.

Best of luck in the market if you are a participant.
 
Thanks for sharing the information. By the way, what is a strangle position ?
 
Thanks for sharing the information. By the way, what is a strangle position ?

A strangle options play is owning both calls and puts. One may set any strike price (provided they are available) according to expectations. This is really one way to hedge. A similar position is owning shares and protective puts. For any uncertain bio, I don't want to own any shares (exposure is too big). I witness three huge bio movers this year: XNPT, MDVN and ITMN. A strangle play would have been highly profitable. And I feel this is the only way to play AMLN given what I know about the company. A single directional play can be more profitable if the betting is correct but faces the risk of being wiped out in case of a wrong call (the lesson I learned was paid in tears and blood back in May 2007 when the FDA issued a complete response letter to DNDN demanding further data). To be profitable, the movements have to be big, either way, as the player is throwing out the other options as insurance. Specifically in the case of AMLN, my calls are at 25 and puts at 17.5. My positions will be wiped out if the pps falls in this range. I expect AMLN to move either above 30 or below 10 upon the FDA's decision being PR'ed. This is a new approach I am taking. So, my stake is rather small. I want to get a feel first.

Being hesitant made me miss MDVN's and ITMN's humongous moves already. I took the task up today with AMLN and will repeat the same play with ITMN with May options once available. I expect ITMN's pps between 15 and 45 upon the FDA's final ruling. My DNDN position is very different --- the data were out for so long and the AC's voting was 17-0 and 13-4 last time around. IMPACT's results exceeded the SPA (Special Protocal Agreement). I haven't decided if I will hedge my DNDN position. But if I do, I likely take some off the table rather than buying protective puts. My paper profits are so sizable that I can take some off at will.

Another hedge play is straddle, selling a higher-strike calls position than the lower-strike calls position one owns (the reverse holds true for puts positions). I don't like it in bio as the upside potential is capped.

There are many different games to be played and I am still learning.

I have found my golden touch back since my short vacation, feeling like what happened from March to September last year. Any position is in the money the next trading session after being built, a really good feeling. Any addition is averaging up rather than down, a really great feeling winning the game. But the banks don't like me. I got back into BAC after setting myself in exile for nearly a month. Finally, I got back in and my position is in the water. I have paid my dear price last year with SVA. That very sad performance is not going to repeat ever again. I will reframe myself from betting more than 10% of capital with any security, saved DNDN and LVS, my two favourites and big money makers --- LVS has been way more profitable than DNDN as my DNDN options are LEAP, any movement in either way is much smaller than that in front-month or near-month optons. I have not traded DNDN much at all, just enjoying the new historic high day after day after day.
 
ITMN

Thanks for the conference link. My impression is that full approval might be of low probability. However, they are probably aiming for conditional approval with minor trials or restricted labels. Not sure what minor trial will be. However, if another trial is needed, it takes 70 weeks and the stock may fall sharply.

If the conditional approval with labels is obtained, maybe it will rise further ?

By the way, what is the event of ADMN ? Its option pricing doesn't seem to indicate anything major occurring. What is your view ?
 
SNS

Just found this company and it is very interesting. CEO was born in 1977 and sold his first business in 2000 for at least a million. Also Buffett-minded.

Still studying ...for potentials like HANS etc. For long-term of course ... If an investment is made in SNS, it is in the CEO's ...
 
Thanks for the conference link. My impression is that full approval might be of low probability. However, they are probably aiming for conditional approval with minor trials or restricted labels. Not sure what minor trial will be. However, if another trial is needed, it takes 70 weeks and the stock may fall sharply.

If the conditional approval with labels is obtained, maybe it will rise further ?

By the way, what is the event of ADMN ? Its option pricing doesn't seem to indicate anything major occurring. What is your view ?

Thanks a lot for sharing your reading on ITMN. The stock will tank if anything less than full approval is obtained on May 4, given it has risen this much. My own reading is that the rise is largely due to short squeeze. For a small floater like this, I have seen even more powerful short squeezes. A friend of mine has entered puts with me. He will do some DD this weekend too. He will let me know his feelings after listening to the CC. I am inclined to add to my April puts next week.

ADMN? I am not aware of it unless you mean AMLN. The FDA was expected to rule on AMLN's key diabetes drug last Friday. Rather than releasing the final decision, the FDA released a report outlining the deficiencies it found at the Ohio manufacturing plant during last December's inspection. This is very unusual and trading was very volatile last Friday. I managed to build my strangle but got calls before puts. A reverse order would have been much more profitable but I am in for the final decision, which is widely expected by Monday. For the strangle, I am fine with any movement as long as it is big. If the ruling is negative and the stock tanks below 10, my calls will become worthless but my puts will be doing great. I will lock in profits with my puts and reverse to a long position. The drug is a multi blockbuster and I firmly believe manufacturing deficiencies will eventually be overcome. It has a biggy in Eli Lilly as a partner.

AMLN has been on a rocky path over the last several years too, like ELN and DNDN. While DNDN is at the brink of a huge success, ELN is still struggling very badly. That will certainly change comes July/August with AAB001 trial results, one way or another. I haven't got my hand around to build my position in ELN yet, hopefully soon. Should AMLN tank next week, I think it would be a great buying opportunity to go long. I am convinced it will emerge as a big success in the end. We shall see. Bio investing takes hard work, conviction, patience, and good luck of course. I have learnt from the two devastations to buy insurance against key events.
 
Just found this company and it is very interesting. CEO was born in 1977 and sold his first business in 2000 for at least a million. Also Buffett-minded.

Still studying ...for potentials like HANS etc. For long-term of course ... If an investment is made in SNS, it is in the CEO's ...

Just took a quick look, very interesting indeed. Such a small floater, never seen it before. My hands are pretty tight at the moment and I will pass. I don't want my investment to be tight to a single person. Of course, the CEO is the most important personnel in any company. That is one key element I look into for any long position.

Capital is limited and I can't be everywhere. Lots of trading chances in Bio for the next few months. I want to focus on one company at a time. I let go GNW, UAUA and HIG way too early. Need to find equivalents for diversification.
 
Key events next week

AMLN: the FDA's ruling on its weekly version of Byetta, expected to be out Monday. PPS is expected to move big

MDVN: ER and CC after market close Monday. Expect Co to provide guidance after the pivotal trial failed. If earnings beat, a small short squeeze may take place and get the pps back to mid- to high-teens.
 
再说明一遍

建楼时原意在于记录个人的交易情况和心得体会,现在逐渐发展到交流信息,挺好!Cat:谢谢你的合作!

提醒读者:我的重仓不仅是生物技术板块,而且大部分是期权,控制不好的话,可谓风险中的风险,mother of all risks。如果谁想做,下手前请自己事先做好功课并且具备过硬的心理承受能力。这玩的是钱,不合适人人玩的,千万小心!

我的三次大失手都是这个板块的:2005年的ELN,2007年的DNDN,和2009年的SVA。SVA与前面两次不同的是虽然损失惨重但毕竟赔的是赢利 (house money),我没把本钱丢进去,还留着一点元气接着玩。等有时间了,我会把SVA赔大钱的体会写出来 --- 根本原因在于自己急于求成以致判断操作都错得离谱。具体体会是:1)鉴于1918年西班牙大流感的严重后果而过高地估计了H1N1可能的杀伤力;2)中国政府统购了SVA的疫苗但没有及时付钱造成季报业绩不好 --- 又是政府跟我过不去;3)SVA自己的融资时机掌握得很不好。是我自己的失手,后果我自己承担,我既不怨天也不尤人,但愿能在面壁思过后学到点什么。
 
后退
顶部