沒錯。人权大于法权
法律是为人服务的
我明白你们在强调什么
他们当年的选择,其实是弱小在强势给的二个坏选择里无赖的一个选择,两个选择都不是他们想要的
在移民审理过程中,结婚的,生子的补办材料的没少见,有评论说这家人显然是被ill informed,呵呵。
村长,我呵呵的不对吗four-year-old son ....
....
The couple’s troubles with Immigration, first reported by the Citizen a year ago, stem from failing to disclose they had a young son they intended to sponsor before they arrived in Canada in January 2013. The plan was to bring Daksh to Ottawa once they were settled.
....
After the couple landed in Montreal on Jan. 28, 2013, Canada Border Service agents began questioning them about their son back home. They were given two choices: State their intention of sponsoring the child but return to India while Immigration reviewed their application, or, then and there, sign a declaration form that they would never attempt to sponsor their son.
They said they agreed to the latter under duress and confusion, following five hours of questioning.
村长,你玩啥呢?[emoji48]four-year-old son ....
....
The couple’s troubles with Immigration, first reported by the Citizen a year ago, stem from failing to disclose they had a young son they intended to sponsor before they arrived in Canada in January 2013. The plan was to bring Daksh to Ottawa once they were settled.
....
After the couple landed in Montreal on Jan. 28, 2013, Canada Border Service agents began questioning them about their son back home. They were given two choices: State their intention of sponsoring the child but return to India while Immigration reviewed their application, or, then and there, sign a declaration form that they would never attempt to sponsor their son.
They said they agreed to the latter under duress and confusion, following five hours of questioning.